Page 36 - CBM27
P. 36

~ Wijnand Jongen ~


            COLUMN










            THE GEO-BLOCKING REGULATION - A BARRIER FOR
            SOME, A THORN FOR OTHERS, BUT A POLITICAL
            TRAMPOLINE FOR A PRIVILEGED FEW


                  rom geo-blocking to geo-enabling            Changes are brewing on the horizon
                  Back in 2018, the Geo-blocking Regulation came into   Now, with the European Parliament’s mandate nearing
            Feffect. The European Commission’s aim was to put an   its end, the members of the European Parliament (MEPs)
            end to the unjustified discrimination faced by EU consumers   decided to share their perspectives (link to be added later) on
            in some circumstances. The Commission (EC) proposed this   the implementation of the Regulation. Many of the European
            law to create more opportunities for trade between consumers   Parliament’s committees are proposing to expand the scope of
            and businesses, preventing unjustified treatment of consumers   the Regulation to include audiovisual (AV) services. As part
            based on their nationality or residency when they try to avail   of the 2025 evaluation, the Commission had already planned
            offers, prices, or sales conditions in another Member State.   to examine the possibility of eliminating the exception
                                                              provided to AV services. This means potentially allowing
            Ecommerce Europe was an active player in the political   copyrighted works to be accessible across all EU countries.
            debate that shaped the new law. We generally supported the   Several MEPs view this change as essential to prevent
            principle of “shopping like a local,” which the Geo-blocking   discrimination against EU citizens, as copyrighted works
            Regulation introduced, however, not at any cost. Traders’ right   should not be limited to certain regions. Ecommerce Europe
            of freedom to contract was and still is, for us, a principle that   mostly focused its action in the past years on the online sales
            must always be safeguarded. That is because there can be valid   of goods and partially on services, but never on copyrighted
            reasons for traders not to sell and deliver to specific markets.   content as such.
            That might be because it is too complicated or too expensive,
            which could prove to lead to close to zero profit, if not losses.    In addition, MEPs are requesting further examination of
                                                              certain aspects related to e-commerce players. Specifically,
            Fast forward to November 2020, the Commission assessed   they want the Commission to amend the legal text to
            the Regulation’s impact and found that the percentage of   force traders to ease access and operations of cross-border
            geo-blocking                                                                     delivery services.
            obstacles decreased   “THE FREEDOM TO DECIDE WHICH                               Also, some MEPs
            from 26.9% to                                                                    want to introduce
            14%. However, the     MEMBER STATE(S) TO TARGET IS A                             an obligation for
            full effects of the                                                              operators offering
            law could not be     FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF SELLERS,                               services in all, or
            accurately measured                                                              at least most, EU
            at that point since                                                              countries, to enable
            the Regulation        AND WE FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT IT                              courier operators
            works hand in hand                                                               to deliver parcels
            with the revision   SHOULD BE MAINTAINED IN CASE THE                             collectively to EU
            of VAT rules in                                                                  countries. We should
            e-commerce and the   EU DECIDES TO REOPEN THE LAW.”                              remember here that,
            harmonisation of                                                                 for the moment, the
            consumer protection                                                              Regulation does not
            rules, which took effect in July 2021 and 2022, respectively.   oblige online traders to deliver physical goods to Member
            Despite this, the EC considered the overall results as positive.   States that they do not target. The freedom to decide which
                                                              Member State(s) to target is a fundamental right of sellers,
            Yet, the Commission’s assessment also identified some   and we firmly believe that it should be maintained in case
            persisting issues in cross-border e-commerce. For example,   the EU decides to reopen the law. We can already see from
            some traders are hesitant to offer cross-border delivery   the discussions in the European Parliament that some MEPs
            options, but also payment location requirements and   seem eager to change this principle and potentially oblige
            administrative obstacles regarding VAT registration.   a small online seller based in Malta to deliver a fridge to







                                                            36
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41